Using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment - a cheat sheet
A post on andymasley.substack.com, published 28 April 2025, is cited by 15 distinct blogs to date (corpus.blog, measured 11 October 2026).
A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not shown here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.
15blogs citing
| Period | Blogs | Links |
|---|---|---|
| All time | 15 | 17 |
| Last 90 days | 0 | 0 |
| Last 30 days | 0 | 0 |
| Last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First cited | 1 May 2025 |
|---|---|
| Latest citation | 20 Feb 2026 |
| Words blogs link it with | 5 |
| External links | 140 |
| Length | 24,837 |
0 this week (still settling) · peak 6
Show as table
| Week of | Value |
|---|---|
| 28 Apr 2025 | 1 |
| 5 May 2025 | 6 |
| 12 May 2025 | 2 |
| 19 May 2025 | 1 |
| 26 May 2025 | 0 |
| 2 Jun 2025 | 0 |
| 9 Jun 2025 | 0 |
| 16 Jun 2025 | 0 |
| 23 Jun 2025 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 2025 | 0 |
| 7 Jul 2025 | 0 |
| 14 Jul 2025 | 0 |
| 21 Jul 2025 | 0 |
| 28 Jul 2025 | 0 |
| 4 Aug 2025 | 0 |
| 11 Aug 2025 | 0 |
| 18 Aug 2025 | 1 |
| 25 Aug 2025 | 1 |
| 1 Sept 2025 | 0 |
| 8 Sept 2025 | 0 |
| 15 Sept 2025 | 0 |
| 22 Sept 2025 | 0 |
| 29 Sept 2025 | 0 |
| 6 Oct 2025 | 0 |
| 13 Oct 2025 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2025 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2025 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2025 | 0 |
| 10 Nov 2025 | 0 |
| 17 Nov 2025 | 0 |
| 24 Nov 2025 | 0 |
| 1 Dec 2025 | 0 |
| 8 Dec 2025 | 0 |
| 15 Dec 2025 | 0 |
| 22 Dec 2025 | 0 |
| 29 Dec 2025 | 0 |
| 5 Jan 2026 | 0 |
| 12 Jan 2026 | 0 |
| 19 Jan 2026 | 0 |
| 26 Jan 2026 | 0 |
| 2 Feb 2026 | 1 |
| 9 Feb 2026 | 0 |
| 16 Feb 2026 | 1 |
| 23 Feb 2026 | 0 |
| 2 Mar 2026 | 0 |
| 9 Mar 2026 | 0 |
| 16 Mar 2026 | 0 |
| 23 Mar 2026 | 0 |
| 30 Mar 2026 | 0 |
| 6 Apr 2026 | 0 |
| 13 Apr 2026 | 0 |
| 20 Apr 2026 | 0 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | 0 |
| 4 May 2026 | 0 |
| 11 May 2026 | 0 |
| 18 May 2026 | 0 |
| 25 May 2026 | 0 |
| 1 Jun 2026 | 0 |
| 8 Jun 2026 | 0 |
| 15 Jun 2026 | 0 |
| 22 Jun 2026 | 0 |
| 29 Jun 2026 | 0 |
| 6 Jul 2026 | 0 |
| 13 Jul 2026 | 0 |
| 20 Jul 2026 | 0 |
| 27 Jul 2026 | 0 |
| 3 Aug 2026 | 0 |
| 10 Aug 2026 | 0 |
| 17 Aug 2026 | 0 |
| 24 Aug 2026 | 0 |
| 31 Aug 2026 | 0 |
| 7 Sept 2026 | 0 |
| 14 Sept 2026 | 0 |
| 21 Sept 2026 | 0 |
| 28 Sept 2026 | 0 (still settling) |
| 5 Oct 2026 | 0 (still settling) |
Shape: spike. Half of its 14 citing blogs had cited it after 9 days; 0% first cited it more than a year on.
Each blog counts once, in the week of its first citation. 1 blog has no dated post that cites this page: counted in the tally, not here. A blog added to the index recently can bring old first citations in at once.
Who cited it
Cited by 15 blogs across 3 subjects: technology 9, books and writing 2, business and economics 2, unclassified 2.
It crossed over: blogs in at least two subjects each make up 15% or more of its classified citers.
- Technology9
- Books and writing2
- Business and economics2
- Unclassified2
Words blogs link it with
The words blogs link this page with, by how many different blogs use them.
- a cheat sheet for why using chatgpt is not bad for the environment2 blogs
- masley argued that1 blog
- a short(ish) summary from masley1 blog
- andy masley1 blog
- andy masley presents a comprehensive argument1 blog
Cited by 15 blogs in 17 posts
One row per blog, the most recently citing first. Each shows the blog's newest citing post; open a row for the others.
linked as “whataboutism”
Read at treyhunner.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “environmental impact”
Read at build.ms (opens in a new tab)linked as “Masley argued that”
Read at mathewingram.com (opens in a new tab)1 other post
linked as “Masley argued that”
Read at mathewingram.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment”
Read at ketanjoshi.co (opens in a new tab)linked as “a short(ish) summary from Masley”
Read at scientistseessquirrel.wordpress.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “Andy Masley”
Read at mjtsai.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “Andy Masley presents a comprehensive argument”
Read at tidbits.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment – a cheat sheet.”
Read at onepercentamonth.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “Why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment”
Read at molily.de (opens in a new tab)linked as ““A cheat sheet for why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment””
Read at rwblickhan.org (opens in a new tab)linked as “Andy Massick explains well”
Read at clune.org (opens in a new tab)linked as “A cheat sheet for why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment”
Read at wersdoerfer.de (opens in a new tab)linked as “A cheat sheet for why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment”
Read at aluhrs.com (opens in a new tab)1 other post
linked as “A cheat sheet for why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment”
Read at aluhrs.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “estimates”
Read at simonwillison.net (opens in a new tab)Links from this post
Elsewhere on andymasley.substack.com (50)
Something wrong here? Report a problem