Record · edzardernst.com
The ‘Lightning Process’: implausible, unproven, hyped and expensive
edzardernst.com · 1 June 2020 · 3 min read
A post on edzardernst.com, published 1 June 2020, is cited by 1 distinct blog to date (corpus.blog, measured 15 October 2026).
A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not shown here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.
1blog citing
| Period | Blogs | Links |
|---|---|---|
| All time | 1 | 1 |
| Last 90 days | 0 | 0 |
| Last 30 days | 0 | 0 |
| Last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First cited | 27 Aug 2020 |
|---|---|
| Latest citation | 27 Aug 2020 |
| Words blogs link it with | 1 |
| External links | 2 |
| Length | 631 |
Words blogs link it with
The words blogs link this page with, by how many different blogs use them.
- controversial psychotherapy1 blog
Cited by 1 blog in 1 post
One row per blog, the most recently citing first. Each shows the blog's newest citing post; open a row for the others.
Blog
Newest citing post
Date
thesciencebit.net1 post
Two takes on the expensive, unproven, and childishly-named quackery known as the Lightning Process
linked as “controversial psychotherapy”
Read at thesciencebit.net (opens in a new tab)27 Aug 2020
Links from this post
Looking for more like this? Find posts and blogs like it
Something wrong here? Report a problem