Blog · corpus.blog/blogs/statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/posts
Andrew Gelman
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
2014
24 Mar 2014
23 Mar 2014
21 Mar 2014
Teaching Bayesian applied statistics to graduate students in political science, sociology, public health, education, economics, . . .original ↗
20 Mar 2014
19 Mar 2014
18 Mar 2014
17 Mar 2014
15 Mar 2014
12 Mar 2014
9 Mar 2014
8 Mar 2014
How much time (if any) should we spend criticizing research that’s fraudulent, crappy, or just plain pointless?original ↗
6 Mar 2014
5 Mar 2014
4 Mar 2014
“We are moving from an era of private data and public analyses to one of public data and private analyses. Just as we have learned to be cautious about data that are missing, we may have to be cautious about missing analyses also.”original ↗
1 Mar 2014
28 Feb 2014
28 Feb 2014
26 Feb 2014
Econometrics, political science, epidemiology, etc.: Don’t model the probability of a discrete outcome, model the underlying continuous variableoriginal ↗
26 Feb 2014
Basketball Stats: Don’t model the probability of win, model the expected score differential.original ↗
25 Feb 2014
24 Feb 2014
22 Feb 2014
21 Feb 2014
Do differences between biology and statistics explain some of our diverging attitudes regarding criticism and replication of scientific claims?original ↗
20 Feb 2014
The replication and criticism movement is not about suppressing speculative research; rather, it’s all about enabling science’s fabled self-correcting natureoriginal ↗
19 Feb 2014
18 Feb 2014
17 Feb 2014
15 Feb 2014
14 Feb 2014
10 Feb 2014
10 Feb 2014
7 Feb 2014
4 Feb 2014
1 Feb 2014
Into the thicket of variation: More on the political orientations of parents of sons and daughters, and a return to the tradeoff between internal and external validity in design and interpretation of research studiesoriginal ↗
31 Jan 2014
29 Jan 2014
“Questioning The Lancet, PLOS, And Other Surveys On Iraqi Deaths, An Interview With Univ. of London Professor Michael Spagat”original ↗
29 Jan 2014
27 Jan 2014
25 Jan 2014
24 Jan 2014
21 Jan 2014
How to think about the statistical evidence when the statistical evidence can’t be conclusive?original ↗
17 Jan 2014
Against overly restrictive definitions: No, I don’t think it helps to describe Bayes as “the analysis of subjective
beliefs” (nor, for that matter, does it help to characterize the statements of Krugman or Mankiw as not being “economics”)original ↗
16 Jan 2014
Postdoc with Liz Stuart on propensity score methods when the covariates are measured with errororiginal ↗
13 Jan 2014
Judea Pearl overview on causal inference, and more general thoughts on the reexpression of existing methods by considering their implicit assumptionsoriginal ↗
13 Jan 2014