corpus.blog
41554 blogs · 4,756,248 posts Claim your blog
Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d2ad-b4d5-7182-b745-de13c2fce7f8

How much time (if any) should we spend criticizing research that’s fraudulent, crappy, or just plain pointless?

Andrew Gelman · published 6 March 2014

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu Wayback capture
0blogs citing
First cited
—
Most recent
—
Rank this month
not ranked
Links from this post
16
Words captured
1,411

Cited by

No blog we hold has cited this post yet.

Links from this post

Link
Host
The replication and criticism movement is not about suppressing speculative research; rather, it’s all about enabling science’s fabled self-correcting nature Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Post-publication peer review: How it (sometimes) really works Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
The Washington Post reprints university press releases without editing them Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2013/08/05/evidence-on-the-impact-of-sustained-use-of-polynomial-regression-on-causal-inference-a-claim-that-coal-heating-is-reducing-lifespan-by-5-years-for-half-a-billion-people/
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/signif4.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2009/05/24/handy_statistic/
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/kanazawa.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/power5r.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/retropower.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/GelmanBasbollAmericanScientist.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/Storytelling_as_Ideology_13.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
7 ways to separate errors from statistics Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2014/03/money-status-and-the-ovulatory-cycle-politically-incorrect-paper-of-the-month.html
marginalrevolution.com
How can statisticians help psychologists do their research better? Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/bayes_management.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2007/08/07/what_is_a_taboo/
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu