Blog · corpus.blog/blogs/statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/posts
Andrew Gelman
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
2016
“The Fundamental Incompatibility of Scalable Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Naive Data Subsampling”original ↗
10 Dec 2016
9 Dec 2016
“So such markets were, and perhaps are, subject to bias from deep pocketed people who may be expressing preference more than actual expectation”original ↗
8 Dec 2016
6 Dec 2016
6 Dec 2016
6 Dec 2016
Using Stan in an agent-based model: Simulation suggests that a market could be useful for building public consensus on climate changeoriginal ↗
5 Dec 2016
Frustration with published results that can’t be reproduced, and journals that don’t seem to careoriginal ↗
4 Dec 2016
30 Nov 2016
30 Nov 2016
26 Nov 2016
23 Nov 2016
22 Nov 2016
Deep learning, model checking, AI, the no-homunculus principle, and the unitary nature of consciousnessoriginal ↗
21 Nov 2016
21 Nov 2016
19 Nov 2016
Good news! PPNAS releases updated guidelines for getting a paper published in their social science divisionoriginal ↗
18 Nov 2016
Anti-immigration attitudes: they didn’t want a bunch of Hungarian refugees coming in the 1950soriginal ↗
17 Nov 2016
17 Nov 2016
15 Nov 2016
15 Nov 2016
Should scientists be allowed to continue to play in the sandbox after they’ve pooped in it?original ↗
14 Nov 2016
14 Nov 2016
12 Nov 2016
11 Nov 2016
A 2% swing: The poll-based forecast did fine (on average) in blue states; they blew it in the red statesoriginal ↗
9 Nov 2016
Election forecasting updating error: We ignored correlations in some of our data, thus producing illusory precision in our inferencesoriginal ↗
9 Nov 2016
8 Nov 2016
8 Nov 2016
8 Nov 2016
How to improve science reporting? Dan Vergano sez: It’s not about reality, it’s all about a salaryoriginal ↗
3 Nov 2016
1 Nov 2016
1 Nov 2016
Unintentional parody of Psychological Science-style research redeemed by Dan Kahan insightoriginal ↗
31 Oct 2016
“It’s not reproducible if it only runs on your laptop”: Jon Zelner’s tips for a reproducible workflow in R and Stanoriginal ↗
30 Oct 2016
29 Oct 2016
29 Oct 2016
Yes, despite what you may have heard, you can easily fit hierarchical mixture models in Stanoriginal ↗
26 Oct 2016
24 Oct 2016
24 Oct 2016
“How One Study Produced a Bunch of Untrue Headlines About Tattoos Strengthening Your Immune System”original ↗
23 Oct 2016
Practical Bayesian model evaluation in Stan and rstanarm using leave-one-out cross-validationoriginal ↗
21 Oct 2016
Authors of AJPS paper find that the signs on their coefficients were reversed. But they don’t care: in their words, “None of our papers actually give a damn about whether it’s plus or minus.” All right, then!original ↗
21 Oct 2016
20 Oct 2016