The Case for 1-to-0 Decades
A post on thenewleafjournal.com, published 13 December 2020, is cited by 1 distinct blog to date (corpus.blog, measured 14 October 2026).
A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not shown here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.
1blog citing
| Period | Blogs | Links |
|---|---|---|
| All time | 1 | 5 |
| Last 90 days | 0 | 0 |
| Last 30 days | 0 | 0 |
| Last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First cited | 20 Apr 2026 |
|---|---|
| Latest citation | 28 Jun 2026 |
| Words blogs link it with | 2 |
| External links | 0 |
| Length | not read yet |
Words blogs link it with
The words blogs link this page with, by how many different blogs use them.
- opted for the 1-to-0 decade1 blog
- 2000-01 through 2009-101 blog
Cited by 1 blog in 5 posts
One row per blog, the most recently citing first. Each shows the blog's newest citing post; open a row for the others.
linked as “opted for the 1-to-0 decade”
Read at social.emucafe.org (opens in a new tab)4 other posts
linked as “opted for the 1-to-0 decade”
Read at social.emucafe.org (opens in a new tab)linked as “opted for the 1-to-0 decade”
Read at social.emucafe.org (opens in a new tab)linked as “2000-01 through 2009-10”
Read at social.emucafe.org (opens in a new tab)linked as “2000-01 through 2009-10”
Read at social.emucafe.org (opens in a new tab)Links from this post
This post links to no other pages.
Something wrong here? Report a problem