'Dead Sea Scrolls' at the Museum of the Bible are all forgeries
A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.
4blogs citing
- First cited
- 13 Mar 2020
- Most recent
- 29 May 2020
- Rank this month
- not ranked
- External links
- 25
- Words captured
- 3,261
How it is described
The words blogs link this post with, by how many different blogs use them.
- “an article posted online earlier today” 1 blog
- “dead sea scrolls at the museum of the bible are fake” 1 blog
- “investigation of the museum of the bible’s dead sea scrolls collection concluded its fragments were not authentic” 1 blog
- “national geographic article” 1 blog
- “this is embarrassing.” 1 blog
Cited by 4 blogs in 6 posts
One row per blog, the most recently citing first. Each shows the blog's newest citing post; open a row for the others.
linked as “National Geographic article”
Read at the source (opens in a new tab)2 other posts
linked as “investigation of the Museum of the Bible’s Dead Sea Scrolls collection concluded its fragments were…”
Read at the source (opens in a new tab)linked as “an article posted online earlier today”
Read at the source (opens in a new tab)linked as “Dead Sea Scrolls at the Museum of the Bible are Fake”
Read at the source (opens in a new tab)Links from this post
Elsewhere on nationalgeographic.com (3)
Something wrong here? Report a problem
A post on nationalgeographic.com is cited by 4 distinct blogs to date (corpus.blog, measured 8 October 2026).