Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d9e6-b357-7355-8d3c-cfa7ec055ab5

The Royal Society has taken some steps to improving reporting of submit/resubmit/accept times

Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week | SV-POW! … All sauropod vertebrae, except when we're talking about Open Access. ISSN 3033-3695 · published 25 July 2013

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at svpow.com Wayback capture

0blogs citing

First cited: —
Most recent: —
Rank this month: not ranked
Links from this post: 10
Words captured: 659

Cited by

No blog we hold has cited this post yet.

Links from this post

Link

Host

Dear Royal Society, please stop lying to us about publication times Read at the source ↗

svpow.com

We will no longer provide peer reviews for Royal Society journals until they adopt honest editorial policies Read at the source ↗

svpow.com

Biology Letters does trumpet its submission-to-acceptance time Read at the source ↗

svpow.com

Lying about submission times at other journals? Read at the source ↗

svpow.com

Discussing Biology Letters with the Royal Society Read at the source ↗

svpow.com

http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/

rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org

http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/

rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org

http://royalsocietypublishing.org/site/authors/Publishing-times.xhtml

royalsocietypublishing.org

http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/280/1767/20131248.full

rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org

http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/9/5/20130383.full

rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org