Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d9e5-ab60-73ed-a681-ebf5e496b96d

Why peer-review may be worth persisting with, despite everything

Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week | SV-POW! … All sauropod vertebrae, except when we're talking about Open Access. ISSN 3033-3695 · published 21 January 2014

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at svpow.com Wayback capture

0blogs citing

First cited: —
Most recent: —
Rank this month: not ranked
Links from this post: 12
Words captured: 672

Cited by

No blog we hold has cited this post yet.

Links from this post

Link

Host

http://blog.peerj.com/post/73296165864/how-to-become-good-at-peer-review

blog.peerj.com

How to become good at peer-review: three points of disagreement Read at the source ↗

svpow.com

chorasimilarity.wordpress.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

en.wikipedia.org

http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/nov/13/science-enforced-humility

theguardian.com

Peer review does not mean we can trust a published paper Read at the source ↗

svpow.com

Where peer-review went wrong Read at the source ↗

svpow.com

Some more of peer-review’s greatest mistakes Read at the source ↗

svpow.com

What is this peer-review process anyway? Read at the source ↗

svpow.com

Well, that about wraps it up for peer-review Read at the source ↗

svpow.com

http://www.dinosaurhome.com/steveculbreth/blog/

dinosaurhome.com

http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/12/S4/S13

breast-cancer-research.com