if you’re already using sophisticated non-Bayesian methods such as those of Tibshirani, Efron, and others, that Bayes is more of an option than a revolution. But if you’re coming out of a pure hypothesis testing training, then Bayes can be a true revelation. I think that is one reason that many methodologists in psychology are such avid Bayesians: they find the openness and the directness of the Bayesian approach to be so liberating.

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

First cited

—

Most recent

—

Rank this month

not ranked

External links

2

Words captured

1,020