41,948 blogs · 5,214,511 posts Claim your blog

Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d2b2-24ee-7237-8066-531e84712270

Evaluating evidence from published research

Andrew Gelman · published 3 September 2013

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu Wayback capture

0blogs citing

First cited: —
Most recent: —
Rank this month: not ranked
External links: 5
Words captured: 1,533

Cited by

No blog we hold has cited this post yet.

Links from this post

Link

Host

https://dynamicecology.wordpress.com/2012/10/11/in-praise-of-pre-publication-peer-review-because-post-publication-review-is-an-utter-failure/

dynamicecology.wordpress.com

https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/referee_v9.pdf

stat.columbia.edu

https://web.archive.org/web/20130809061327/https://symposium-magazine.com/science-journalism-and-the-art-of-expressing-uncertainty/

web.archive.org

https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/ChanceEthics2.pdf

stat.columbia.edu

https://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2013/8/29/science-and-the-craft-norms-of-science-journalism-part-2-mak.html

culturalcognition.net

Elsewhere on statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu (5)

Post-publication peer review: How it (sometimes) really works Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Everything is Obvious (once you know the answer) Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2005/08/05/dennis_the_denv/

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/?s=dentist+dennis

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Fowlerpalooza! Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu