Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d287-0e0a-701a-9979-ca588e765635
How to think about research, and research criticism, and research criticism criticism, and research criticism criticism criticism?
Andrew Gelman · published 17 May 2018
A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.
0blogs citing
- First cited
- —
- Most recent
- —
- Rank this month
- not ranked
- External links
- 8
- Words captured
- 2,865
Cited by
No blog we hold has cited this post yet.
Links from this post
Link
Host
darrendahly.github.io
neurochambers.blogspot.com
scholarworks.iu.edu
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
Elsewhere on statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu (5)
“However noble the goal, research findings should be reported accurately. Distortion of results often occurs not in the data presented but . . . in the abstract, discussion, secondary literature and press releases. Such distortion can lead to unsupported beliefs about what works for obesity treatment and prevention. Such unsupported beliefs may in turn adversely affect future research efforts and the decisions of lawmakers, clinicians and public health leaders.” Read at the source ↗