corpus.blog
41,554 blogs · 4,969,865 posts Claim your blog
Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d278-5cfe-71d9-80b0-7b782866f5f9

Four projects in the intellectual history of quantitative social science

Andrew Gelman · published 12 January 2020

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu Wayback capture
0blogs citing
First cited
—
Most recent
—
Rank this month
not ranked
External links
2
Words captured
895

Cited by

No blog we hold has cited this post yet.

Links from this post

Link
Host
Elsewhere on statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu (12)
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2008/12/01/could_we_publis/
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Joanne Gowa scooped me by 22 years in my criticism of Axelrod’s Evolution of Cooperation Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2005/04/19/loss_aversion_e/
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2008/12/15/risk_aversion_a/
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Don’t idealize “risk aversion” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Differences between econometrics and statistics: From varying treatment effects to utilities, economists seem to like models that are fixed in stone, while statisticians tend to be more comfortable with variation Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
“Thus, a loss aversion principle is rendered superfluous to an account of the phenomena it was introduced to explain.” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2009/11/05/slipperiness_of/
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Risk aversion is a two-way street Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Alison Mattek on physics and psychology, philosophy, models, explanations, and formalization Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
“One of the easiest ways to differentiate an economist from almost anyone else in society” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Economics now = Freudian psychology in the 1950s: More on the incoherence of “economics exceptionalism” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu