corpus.blog
43,228 blogs · 5,519,570 posts Claim your blog
Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d272-8274-7161-9729-334759fb1468

Can the science community help journalists avoid science hype? It won’t be easy.

Andrew Gelman · published 21 July 2020

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu Wayback capture
0blogs citing
First cited
—
Most recent
—
Rank this month
not ranked
External links
3
Words captured
1,098

Cited by

No blog we hold has cited this post yet.

Links from this post

Link
Host
Elsewhere on statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu (12)
Concerns with that Stanford study of coronavirus prevalence Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
bla bla bla PEER REVIEW bla bla bla Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Surgisphere scandal: Lancet still doesn’t get it Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Dear Cornell University Public Relations Office Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
The “scientist as hero” narrative Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
The all-important distinction between truth and evidence Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Raghuram Rajan: “The Third Pillar: How Markets and the State Leave the Community Behind” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Please socially distance me from this regression model! Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
MIT’s science magazine misrepresents critics of Stanford study Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Fake MIT journalists misrepresent real Buzzfeed journalist. (Maybe we shouldn’t be so surprised?) Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Selection bias in the reporting of shaky research Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Selection bias in the reporting of shaky research: An example Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu