“Figure 1 looks like random variation to me” . . . indeed, so it does. And Figure 2 as well! But statistical significance was found, so this bit of randomness was published in a top journal. Business as usual in the statistical-industrial complex. Still, I’d hope the BMJ could’ve done better.

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

First cited

—

Most recent

—

Rank this month

not ranked

External links

4

Words captured

753