41,554 blogs · 4,969,865 posts Claim your blog

Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d267-ce37-70d7-afd9-4823b157bf0a

Is the accuracy of Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding bad news for privacy protection at the Census? Technically no, PR-wise probably.

Andrew Gelman · published 27 October 2021

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu Wayback capture

0blogs citing

First cited: —
Most recent: —
Rank this month: not ranked
External links: 6
Words captured: 2,198

Cited by

No blog we hold has cited this post yet.

Links from this post

Link

Host

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abk3283

science.org

https://mggg.org/publications/DP.pdf

mggg.org

https://differentialprivacy.org/inference-is-not-a-privacy-violation/

differentialprivacy.org

https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s11113-021-09674-3

link.springer.com

https://gking.harvard.edu/publications/letter-us-census-bureau-request-release-%E2%80%9Cnoisy-measurements-file%E2%80%9D-september-30

gking.harvard.edu

https://datasociety.net/library/balancing-data-utility-and-confidentiality-in-the-2020-us-census/

datasociety.net

Elsewhere on statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu (4)

How does post-processed differentially private Census data affect redistricting? How concerned should we be about gerrymandering with the new DAS? Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/table_das_vs_census2010.png

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Shots taken, shots returned regarding the Census’ motivation for using differential privacy (and btw, it’s not an algorithm) Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

An urgent puzzle Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu