41554 blogs · 4,756,248 posts Claim your blog

Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d261-d013-7381-93e2-50ee79f1bd15

What happens to the Wall Street Journal’s reputation when they publish a regular column by someone associated with fraudulent research?

Andrew Gelman · published 17 July 2022

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu Wayback capture

0blogs citing

First cited: —
Most recent: —
Rank this month: not ranked
Links from this post: 7
Words captured: 542

Cited by

No blog we hold has cited this post yet.

Links from this post

Link

Host

https://www.wsj.com/news/types/ask-ariely

wsj.com

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/stephaniemlee/dan-ariely-honesty-study-retraction

buzzfeednews.com

Oh, I hate it when work is criticized (or, in this case, fails in attempted replications) and then the original researchers don’t even consider the possibility that maybe in their original work they were inadvertently just finding patterns in noise. Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Shreddergate! And an idea for a Museum of Scholarly Misconduct. Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Some unexpected insights from Dan Ariely’s Wall Street Journal’s advice column! Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Asymmetries in research misconduct in collaborations Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2008/11/02/political-attitudes-of-the-super-rich/

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu