corpus.blog
41,554 blogs · 4,819,422 posts Claim your blog
Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d259-efb0-708f-a48f-ea78f0cd7a12

Ted-talking purveyors of fake data who write books about lying and rule-breaking . . . what’s up with that?

Andrew Gelman · published 21 June 2023

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu Wayback capture
1blogs citing
First cited
4 Jul 2023
Most recent
4 Jul 2023
Rank this month
not ranked
External links
11
Words captured
2,564

Cited by

Blog
In the post
Date
Error Statistics Philosophy
A new generation of poster children of fraud in behavioral science: What I recommend (i)(ii) Read at the source ↗
4 Jul 2023

Links from this post

Link
Host
[109] Data Falsificada (Part 1): “Clusterfake” Read at the source ↗
datacolada.org
https://www.chronicle.com/article/a-weird-research-misconduct-scandal-about-dishonesty-just-got-weirder
chronicle.com
https://www.rebeltalents.org/
rebeltalents.org
https://www.amazon.com/Rebel-Talent-Francesca-Gino-audiobook/dp/B079T6Y34H/ref=sr_1_1?crid=230FUWYIM5B2O&keywords=rebel+talent&qid=1687171993&sprefix=rebel+talen%2Caps%2C157&sr=8-1
amazon.com
https://columbophile.com/2015/09/22/columbo-episode-review-ransom-for-a-dead-man/
columbophile.com
https://freakonomics.com/2013/11/the-cheaters-high/
freakonomics.com
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797614520714
journals.sagepub.com
https://www.bps.org.uk/research-digest/psychology-gift-giving
bps.org.uk
https://www.ted.com/talks/francesca_gino_the_power_of_why_unlocking_a_curious_mind
ted.com
https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1523586113
pnas.org
https://www.npr.org/2018/07/23/631524581/you-2-0-rebel-with-a-cause
npr.org
Elsewhere on statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu (10)
Unlike MIT, Scientific American does the right thing and flags an inaccurate and irresponsible article that they mistakenly published. Here’s the story: Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Evilicious: Why We Evolved a Taste for Being Bad Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Schoolmarms and lightning bolts: Data faker meets Edge foundation in an unintentional reveal of problems with the Great Man model of science Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Shreddergate! And an idea for a Museum of Scholarly Misconduct. Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
A scandal in Tedhemia: Noted study in psychology first fails to replicate (but is still promoted by NPR), then crumbles with striking evidence of data fraud Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Hark, hark! the p-value at heaven’s gate sings Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2009/05/24/handy_statistic/
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Arrow’s other theorem Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
A Bayesian approach for peer-review panels? and a speculation about Bruno Frey Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
“Why We Sleep — a tale of institutional failure” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu