corpus.blog
41554 blogs · 4,504,310 posts Claim your blog
Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d259-efb0-708f-a48f-ea78e72483fb

Cheating in science, sports, journalism, business, and art: How do they differ?

Andrew Gelman · published 7 July 2023

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu Wayback capture
0blogs citing
First cited
—
Most recent
—
Rank this month
not ranked
Links from this post
29
Words captured
7,069

Cited by

No blog we hold has cited this post yet.

Links from this post

Link
Host
https://blog.danieldavies.com/2004_05_23_d-squareddigest_archive.html
blog.danieldavies.com
“This is a story some economists like to tell . . .” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Economics as a community Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
The politics of economic and statistical models Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Thoughts inspired by “the Gospel of Jesus’s Wife” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
It’s worse than you might think: Passive corruption in the social sciences Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2009/05/24/handy_statistic/
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Thinking fast, slow, and not at all: System 3 jumps the shark Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Some thoughts after reading “Bad Blood: Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
A ladder of responses to criticism, from the most responsible to the most destructive Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Everything is Obvious (once you know the answer) Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2007/12/31/terrorism_futur/
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
What’s the stupidest thing the NYC Department of Education and Columbia University Teachers College did in the past decade? Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/ChanceEthics14.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
PACE study and the Lancet: Journal reputation is a two-way street Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
The two faces of Erving Goffman: Subtle observer of human interactions, and Smug organzation man Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
W’man < W'pedia, again Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Social science plaig update Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/reversecausal_13oct05.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
More bad news in the scientific literature: A 3-day study is called “long term,” and nobody even seems to notice the problem. Whassup with that?? Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Surgisphere scandal: Lancet still doesn’t get it Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Two exciting movie ideas: “Second Chance U” and “The New Dirty Dozen” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://slate.com/technology/2018/03/its-hard-to-criticize-science-without-looking-like-an-obsessive.html
slate.com
https://www.thedailybeast.com/ta-nehisi-coates-david-brooks-and-the-street-code-of-journalism
thedailybeast.com
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2010/05/12/alert_incompete/
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Gresham’s Law of experimental methods Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Jessica Tracy and Alec Beall (authors of the fertile-women-wear-pink study) comment on our Garden of Forking Paths paper, and I comment on their comments Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/causal_paths_3.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
https://www.bookandsword.com/2023/09/23/some-thoughts-on-davies-lying-for-money-2018/
bookandsword.com