Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d259-efb0-708f-a48f-ea78e36f19bf

What data to include in an analysis? Not always such an easy question. (Elliott Morris / Nate Silver / Rasmussen polls edition)

Andrew Gelman · published 17 July 2023

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu Wayback capture

0blogs citing

First cited: —
Most recent: —
Rank this month: not ranked
External links: 14
Words captured: 3,016

Cited by

No blog we hold has cited this post yet.

Links from this post

Link

Host

https://natesilver.substack.com/p/polling-averages-shouldnt-be-political

natesilver.substack.com

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/public_surveys/abc_news_answer_our_questions_or_else

rasmussenreports.com

https://twitter.com/gelliottmorris/status/1675623252750630912

twitter.com

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/09/politics/read-cnn-transparency-questionnaire-polling/index.html

edition.cnn.com

https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1674559766700478468

twitter.com

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/abc-threatens-rasmussen-polls-for-talking-to-bannon-fox

washingtonexaminer.com

https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1674432289600839683

twitter.com

https://news.gallup.com/poll/506759/broader-support-abortion-rights-continues-post-dobbs.aspx

news.gallup.com

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/abortion-roe-v-wade-dobbs-anniversary-opinion-poll-2023-06-21/

cbsnews.com

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/06/18/poll-abortion-support-dobbs-overturned-roe-v-wade/70320647007/

eu.usatoday.com

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/rasmussen-reports-poll-conspiracy-theories-election-denialism-covid-vaccine_n_64b05d9fe4b093f07cada517

huffpost.com

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/polls-policy-and-faqs/

fivethirtyeight.com

https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/probdecisive2.pdf

stat.columbia.edu

https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/jdm200907b.pdf

stat.columbia.edu

Elsewhere on statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu (11)

https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2008/08/30/wacky_poll_numb/

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

How to think about intellectual diversity in academia? The case of astrology and Dr. Oz Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

More implausible numbers from Columbia University’s U.S. News ranking Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Justin Grimmer vs. the Hoover Institution commenters Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2009/05/24/handy_statistic/

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Did that “bottomless soup bowl” experiment ever happen? Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

“It’s turtles for quite a way down, but at some point it’s solid bedrock.” Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Thinking about election forecast uncertainty Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Reverse-engineering the problematic tail behavior of the Fivethirtyeight presidential election forecast Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Concerns with our Economist election forecast Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu

Some challenges with existing election forecasting methods Read at the source ↗

statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu