corpus.blog
41,554 blogs · 4,969,865 posts Claim your blog
Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d254-1d7a-72a9-8e73-976d1175e700

What is the prevalence of bad social science?

Andrew Gelman · published 6 April 2024

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu Wayback capture
0blogs citing
First cited
—
Most recent
—
Rank this month
not ranked
External links
12
Words captured
1,914

Cited by

No blog we hold has cited this post yet.

Links from this post

Link
Host
https://twitter.com/jonatanpallesen/status/1741240942990921917
twitter.com
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/power5r.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
https://slate.com/technology/2013/07/statistics-and-psychology-multiple-comparisons-give-spurious-results.html
slate.com
https://web.archive.org/web/20131118074128/https://www.symposium-magazine.com/childhood-intervention-and-earnings/
web.archive.org
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/rd_china_5.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2023/12/31/honor-council-member-gay/
thecrimson.com
https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2023/12/12/understanding-the-claudine-gay-plagiarism-scandal/
plagiarismtoday.com
https://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2023/12/21/congress-to-investigate-claudine-gay-plagiarism-allegations/
plagiarismtoday.com
https://slate.com/technology/2018/03/its-hard-to-criticize-science-without-looking-like-an-obsessive.html
slate.com
https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/cgay/files/Gay_APSR_Sep_01.pdf
scholar.harvard.edu
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZgItO4W1e4-U_QEGduKnc3SKLvfjzC5L/view
drive.google.com
https://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/ecological.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
Elsewhere on statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu (15)
Study published in 2011, followed by successful replication in 2003 [sic] Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
This is what “power = .06” looks like. Get used to it. Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Hurricanes vs. Himmicanes Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Air rage update Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Driving a stake through that ages-ending-in-9 paper Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Pizzagate update! Response from the Cornell University Media Relations Office Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
More gremlins: “Instead, he simply pretended the other two estimates did not exist. That is inexcusable.” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Another Regression Discontinuity Disaster and what can we learn from it Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
The real problem of that nudge meta-analysis is not that it includes 12 papers by noted fraudsters; it’s the GIGO of it all Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
More bad news in the scientific literature: A 3-day study is called “long term,” and nobody even seems to notice the problem. Whassup with that?? Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
That controversial claim that high genetic diversity, or low genetic diversity, is bad for the economy Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
“Participants reported being hungrier when they walked into the café (mean = 7.38, SD = 2.20) than when they walked out [mean = 1.53, SD = 2.70, F(1, 75) = 107.68, P < 0.001].” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Plagiarism means never having to say you’re clueless. Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Ahhhh, Cornell! Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
“Why We Sleep — a tale of institutional failure” Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu