corpus.blog
41,554 blogs · 4,904,241 posts Claim your blog
Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d254-1d7a-72a9-8e73-976d1029685e

People have needed rituals to turn data into truth for many years. Why would we be surprised if many people now need procedural reforms to work?

Andrew Gelman · published 8 April 2024

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu Wayback capture
1blogs citing
First cited
9 Apr 2024
Most recent
9 Apr 2024
Rank this month
not ranked
External links
2
Words captured
1,000

Cited by

Blog
In the post
Date
dynamicecology.wordpress.com
How rigorous are the arguments in favor of “rigor-enhancing” scientific practices? Read at the source ↗
9 Apr 2024

Links from this post

Link
Host
Elsewhere on statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu (5)
The feel-good open science story versus the preregistration (who do you think wins?) Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
It’s Ariely time! They had a preregistration but they didn’t follow it. Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
There is no golden path to discovery. One of my problems with all the focus on p-hacking, preregistration, harking, etc. is that I fear that it is giving the impression that all will be fine if researchers just avoid “questionable research practices.” And that ain’t the case. Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Here are some ways of making your study replicable. (No, the first steps are not preregistration or increasing the sample size!) Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Brian Nosek on “Here are some ways of making your study replicable”: Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu