corpus.blog
56,966 blogs · 4,417,066 posts Claim your blog
Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0d250-555e-710b-b86e-4ac49b1f7032

What’s the story behind that paper by the Center for Open Science team that just got retracted?

Andrew Gelman · published 26 September 2024

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu Wayback capture
2blogs citing
First cited
19 Nov 2024
Most recent
19 Feb 2025
Rank this month
not ranked
Links from this post
23
Words captured
5,060

Cited by

Blog
In the post
Date
blog.jcx.au
A critical behavioural economics and behavioural science reading list Read at the source ↗
19 Feb 2025
joebakcoleman.com
I did not want to write another blog post. Read at the source ↗
19 Nov 2024

Links from this post

Link
Host
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01749-9
nature.com
Bruised and battered, I couldn’t tell what I felt. I was ungeneralizable to myself. Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03486-5
nature.com
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01997-3
nature.com
Here are some ways of making your study replicable. (No, the first steps are not preregistration or increasing the sample size!) Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Brian Nosek on “Here are some ways of making your study replicable”: Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/jcp.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01982-w
nature.com
Of course its preregistered. Just give me a sec Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
The feel-good open science story versus the preregistration (who do you think wins?) Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/blogs-i-read/
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Well, today we find our heroes flying along smoothly… Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://joebakcoleman.com/blog/2024/protzko/
joebakcoleman.com
Oh no Stanford no no no not again please make it stop Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://closertotruth.com/contributor/stephen-chorover/
closertotruth.com
https://osf.io/4k5sf
osf.io
50 shades of gray: A research story Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
There is no golden path to discovery. One of my problems with all the focus on p-hacking, preregistration, harking, etc. is that I fear that it is giving the impression that all will be fine if researchers just avoid “questionable research practices.” And that ain’t the case. Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Harking, Sharking, Tharking Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Why I continue to support the science reform movement despite its flaws Read at the source ↗
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
https://groups.google.com/g/openscienceframework/c/2nhHMdGGhrw
groups.google.com
https://stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/Forking_paths.pdf
stat.columbia.edu
https://stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/philosophy.pdf
stat.columbia.edu