56,966 blogs · 4,417,066 posts Claim your blog

Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a0c579-c201-73e8-9f93-59108ddc1bd2

Mercurial vs Git: it’s all in the branches

felipec.wordpress.com · published 16 January 2011

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at felipec.wordpress.com Wayback capture

1blogs citing

First cited: 3 Jun 2016
Most recent: 3 Jun 2016
Rank this month: not ranked
Links from this post: 12
Words captured: 1,813

Cited by

Blog

In the post

Date

Anjana Sofia Vakil

Warming up to Mercurial Read at the source ↗

3 Jun 2016

Links from this post

Link

Host

http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/2008-July/006308.html

pidgin.im

http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/DVCSAnalysis

code.google.com

https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitSurvey2010

git.wiki.kernel.org

https://github.com/blog/642-smart-http-support

github.com

http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=2454

code.google.com

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1598759/git-and-mercurial-compare-and-contrast

stackoverflow.com

No, mercurial branches are still not better than git ones; response to jhw’s More On Mercurial vs. Git (with Graphs!) Read at the source ↗

felipec.wordpress.com

https://felipec.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/s1.png

felipec.wordpress.com

https://felipec.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/s2.png

felipec.wordpress.com

http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/BookmarksExtension

mercurial.selenic.com

https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitProjects

git.wiki.kernel.org

http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ProjectsUsingMercurial

mercurial.selenic.com