corpus.blog
56,966 blogs · 4,417,066 posts Claim your blog
Record · corpus.blog/posts/01a087e2-af91-712b-8206-3a2ccb1b2ace

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

journals.plos.org · published 24 November 2025

A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not held here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.

Read the post at journals.plos.org Wayback capture
33blogs citing
First cited
18 Jan 2015
Most recent
20 Aug 2026
Rank this month
not ranked
Links from this post
37
Words captured
5,554

Cited by

Blog
In the post
Date
musaalgharbi.com
Jason Arday, Institutional Failure and Culture War Inhumanity Read at the source ↗
20 Aug 2026
zeitraum.blog
Poison in the Corpus: The Antidote in Sight Read at the source ↗
28 Mar 2026
zeitraum.blog
Poison in the Corpus: The Antidote in Sight Read at the source ↗
28 Mar 2026
uniliterate.com
The Propulsion Papers—Part III: The Forensic Flip: Surviving the Era of Fake AI Citations Read at the source ↗
26 Mar 2026
felipec.wordpress.com
On being wrong Read at the source ↗
2 Oct 2025
jeffnobbs.com
Top 10 Flaws in Mainstream Reporting of the Seed Oil Debate Read at the source ↗
13 Jan 2025
Error Statistics Philosophy
Guest Post: Andrea Saltelli: Analytic flexibility: a badly kept secret? (thoughts on “abandon statistical significance 5 years on”) Read at the source ↗
16 Jun 2024
mecfsresearchreview.me
Remarkable researchers hunting for ‘something in the blood’ of people with ME Read at the source ↗
8 May 2024
Condensed concepts
Certain benefits of Bayes Read at the source ↗
5 Jan 2024
Mark Rzepczynski
Ioannidis on research prejudices - You will find the problem in finance Read at the source ↗
2 Oct 2023
Mark Rzepczynski
Ioannidis on research prejudices - You will find the problem in finance Read at the source ↗
2 Oct 2023
Selected Posts | ashishb.net
Book Summary: The half-life of Facts by Samuel Arbesman Read at the source ↗
16 Jul 2023
phelanomics.wordpress.com
The Costs and Benefits of Peer Review Read at the source ↗
25 Jan 2023
Andrew Gelman
Explanation and reproducibility in data-driven science (new course) Read at the source ↗
3 Jan 2023
corinwagen.github.io
Against Carbon NMR Read at the source ↗
14 Dec 2022
jeffnobbs.com
The Problem with Observational Studies (Epidemiology) Read at the source ↗
8 Aug 2021
drmalcolmkendrick.org
Covid19 – the final nail in coffin of medical research Read at the source ↗
28 Jun 2021
Oliver Palmer
The crisis of optimisation Read at the source ↗
29 May 2021
boazsobrado.com
Social Proof of Work Read at the source ↗
15 Jan 2021
inframethodology.cbs.dk
The Advertiser’s Stance Read at the source ↗
6 Nov 2020
* arachnoid.com
The Scientific Paradigm : Feedback Read at the source ↗
29 Oct 2020
eighteenthelephant.com
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Alternative Careers, and Active Learning Read at the source ↗
19 Sept 2020
mathpn.com
What are NOT p-values? Read at the source ↗
3 Sept 2020
almostintuitive.com
Observational studies Read at the source ↗
20 Jul 2020
dirnagl.com
“The Ioannidis Affair” Read at the source ↗
1 Jun 2020
Observations on film art
Can the science of mirror neurons explain the power of camera movement? A guest post by Malcolm Turvey Read at the source ↗
3 May 2020
dirnagl.com
On triangulation in experimentation Read at the source ↗
16 Mar 2019
shape-of-code.com
Replication: not always worth the effort Read at the source ↗
30 Apr 2018
angelaambroz.com
Power bummer Read at the source ↗
14 Dec 2017
drmalcolmkendrick.org
What causes heart disease part XXXV (thirty five) Read at the source ↗
19 Aug 2017
metasd.com
The survival value of wrong beliefs Read at the source ↗
2 Aug 2017
Andrew Gelman
Let’s stop talking about published research findings being true or false Read at the source ↗
29 Jun 2017
muircheartblog.wpcomstaging.com
It’s so important to be disinterested in science Read at the source ↗
23 Aug 2016
skeptvet.com
SkeptVet’s Acupuncture Adventure- The Hand’s On Training and Wrap-Up Read at the source ↗
22 Apr 2016
archy.deberker.com
What’s the deal with modafinil? Read at the source ↗
22 Nov 2015
drmalcolmkendrick.org
The Augean Stables – part II Read at the source ↗
7 Sept 2015
blog.edhagen.net
Monkey butts, menstrual cycles, sex, and the color pink. The statistical crisis in science Read at the source ↗
27 Jun 2015
skeptvet.com
Everything We Eat Cures Cancer! (or Causes it?) Read at the source ↗
13 May 2015
Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week | SV-POW! … All sauropod vertebrae, except when we're talking about Open Access. ISSN 3033-3695
Live-blog: the Future of Scholarly Scientific Communication Read at the source ↗
20 Apr 2015
dcscience.net
The reproducibility of Science. A meeting report. Read at the source ↗
14 Apr 2015
dirnagl.com
The “Broken Science” (aka “waste”) debate: A personal cheat sheet Read at the source ↗
7 Apr 2015
shermandorn.com
Research synthesis requires giving up information Read at the source ↗
17 Feb 2015
skeptvet.com
Can We Trust Published Scientific Research? Read at the source ↗
18 Jan 2015

Links from this post

Link
Host
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Any+casualties+in+the+clash+of+randomised+and+observational+evidence%3F+Ioannidis+2001
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Those+confounded+vitamins%3A+What+can+we+learn+from+the+differences+between+observational+versus+randomised+trial+evidence%3F+Lawlor+2004
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=When+are+observational+studies+as+credible+as+randomised+trials%3F+Vandenbroucke+2004
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Prediction+of+cancer+outcome+with+microarrays%3A+A+multiple+random+validation+strategy.+Michiels+2005
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Replication+validity+of+genetic+association+studies.+Ioannidis+2001
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Problems+of+reporting+genetic+associations+with+complex+outcomes.+Colhoun+2003
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Genetic+associations%3A+False+or+true%3F+Ioannidis+2003
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Microarrays+and+molecular+research%3A+Noise+discovery%3F+Ioannidis+2005
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Sifting+the+evidence%E2%80%94What%26apos%3Bs+wrong+with+significance+tests.+Sterne+2001
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Assessing+the+probability+that+a+positive+report+is+false%3A+An+approach+for+molecular+epidemiology+studies.+Wacholder+2004
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Searching+for+genetic+determinants+in+the+new+millennium.+Risch+2000
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Failing+the+public+health%E2%80%94Rofecoxib%2C+Merck%2C+and+the+FDA.+Topol+2004
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Why+do+we+need+some+large%2C+simple+randomized+trials%3F+Yusuf+1984
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=What+do+we+mean+by+validating+a+prognostic+model%3F+Altman+2000
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Epidemiology+faces+its+limits.+Taubes+1995
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Molecular+classification+of+cancer%3A+Class+discovery+and+class+prediction+by+gene+expression+monitoring.+Golub+1999
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=The+CONSORT+statement%3A+Revised+recommendations+for+improving+the+quality+of+reports+of+parallel-group+randomised+trials.+Moher+2001
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Better+reporting+of+harms+in+randomized+trials%3A+An+extension+of+the+CONSORT+statement.+Ioannidis+2004
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ICH+Harmonised+Tripartite+Guideline.+Statistical+principles+for+clinical+trials.++1999
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Improving+the+quality+of+reports+of+meta-analyses+of+randomised+controlled+trials%3A+The+QUOROM+statement.+Quality+of+Reporting+of+Meta-analyses.+Moher+1999
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Meta-analysis+of+observational+studies+in+epidemiology%3A+A+proposal+for+reporting.+Meta-analysis+of+Observational+Studies+in+Epidemiology+%28MOOSE%29+group.+Stroup+2000
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Unpublished+rating+scales%3A+A+major+source+of+bias+in+randomised+controlled+trials+of+treatments+for+schizophrenia.+Marshall+2000
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Transfer+of+technology+from+statistical+journals+to+the+biomedical+literature.+Past+trends+and+future+predictions.+Altman+1994
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Empirical+evidence+for+selective+reporting+of+outcomes+in+randomized+trials%3A+Comparison+of+protocols+to+published+articles.+Chan+2004
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Scientific+journals+and+their+authors%26apos%3B+financial+interests%3A+A+pilot+study.+Krimsky+1998
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Reporting+of+conflicts+of+interest+in+guidelines+of+preventive+and+therapeutic+interventions.+Papanikolaou+2001
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=A+comparison+of+results+of+meta-analyses+of+randomized+control+trials+and+recommendations+of+clinical+experts.+Treatments+for+myocardial+infarction.+Antman+1992
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Early+extreme+contradictory+estimates+may+appear+in+published+research%3A+The+Proteus+phenomenon+in+molecular+genetics+research+and+randomized+trials.+Ioannidis+2005
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Predictive+ability+of+DNA+microarrays+for+cancer+outcomes+and+correlates%3A+An+empirical+assessment.+Ntzani+2003
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rules+of+evidence+for+cancer+molecular-marker+discovery+and+validation.+Ransohoff+2004
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=A+statistical+paradox.+Lindley+1957
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=A+comment+on+D.V.+Lindley%26apos%3Bs+statistical+paradox.+Bartlett+1957
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Two+cheers+for+P-values.+Senn+2001
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Clinical+trial+registration%3A+A+statement+from+the+International+Committee+of+Medical+Journal+Editors.+De+Angelis+2004
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Contradicted+and+initially+stronger+effects+in+highly+cited+clinical+research.+Ioannidis+2005
scholar.google.com
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Comparison+of+methods+for+estimating+the+number+of+true+null+hypotheses+in+multiplicity+testing.+Hsueh+2003
scholar.google.com
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
doi.org