If deepseek wants to be a real disruptor it should go much further on data transparency
https:/
A page on theodi.org, which corpus.blog does not hold as a blog, is cited by 2 distinct blogs to date (corpus.blog, measured 9 October 2026).
A record is what was published and who pointed at it. corpus.blog does not hold this page -- read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.
2blogs citing
| Period | Blogs | Links |
|---|---|---|
| All time | 2 | 3 |
| Last 90 days | 0 | 0 |
| Last 30 days | 0 | 0 |
| Last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First cited | 5 Feb 2025 |
|---|---|
| Latest citation | 18 Feb 2025 |
| Anchor phrases | 3 |
How it is described
The words blogs link this page with, by how many different blogs use them.
- criticado por su falta de transparencia1 blog
- criticized for its lack of transparency1 blog
- if deepseek wants to be a real disruptor, it should go much further on data transparency1 blog
Cited by 2 blogs in 3 posts
One row per blog, the most recently citing first. Each shows the blog's newest citing post; open a row for the others.
linked as “criticized for its lack of transparency”
Read at the source (opens in a new tab)1 other post
linked as “criticado por su falta de transparencia”
Read at the source (opens in a new tab)linked as “If DeepSeek wants to be a real disruptor, it should go much further on data transparency”
Read at the source (opens in a new tab)Something wrong with this page’s record? Report a problem with If deepseek wants to be a real disruptor it should go much further on data transparency