Record · badscience.net
http://www.badscience.net/?p=172
badscience.net
A page on badscience.net is cited by 2 distinct blogs to date (corpus.blog, measured 12 October 2026).
A record is what was published and who pointed at it. corpus.blog does not hold this page: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.
Is this your blog?
badscience.net is not yet a blog corpus.blog holds. 2 blogs cite it. If it is yours, claim it.
2blogs citing
| Period | Blogs | Links |
|---|---|---|
| All time | 2 | 2 |
| Last 90 days | 0 | 0 |
| Last 30 days | 0 | 0 |
| Last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First cited | 8 Aug 2006 |
|---|---|
| Latest citation | 4 Sept 2008 |
| Words blogs link it with | 2 |
Words blogs link it with
The words blogs link this page with, by how many different blogs use them.
- ben goldacre1 blog
- ‘and humanities graduates in the media, who suspect themselves to be intellectuals, desperately need to reinforce the idea that science is nonsense: because they’ve denied themselves access to the most significant developments in the history of western thought for 200 years, and secretly, deep down, they’re angry with themselves over that.’1 blog
Cited by 2 blogs in 2 posts
One row per blog, the most recently citing first. Each shows the blog's newest citing post; open a row for the others.
Blog
Newest citing post
Date
duncan.hull.name1 post
4 Sept 2008
Links for 8th August
linked as “‘And humanities graduates in the media, who suspect themselves to be intellectuals, desperately need…”
Read at idiolect.org.uk (opens in a new tab)8 Aug 2006
Something wrong with this page’s record? Report a problem with badscience.net/?p=172