Using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment
A post on andymasley.substack.com, published 13 January 2025, is cited by 14 distinct blogs to date (corpus.blog, measured 11 October 2026).
A record is what was published and who pointed at it. The text of the post is not shown here: read it at the source, or at its Wayback capture.
14blogs citing
| Period | Blogs | Links |
|---|---|---|
| All time | 14 | 15 |
| Last 90 days | 0 | 0 |
| Last 30 days | 0 | 0 |
| Last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First cited | 20 Jan 2025 |
|---|---|
| Latest citation | 17 May 2026 |
| Words blogs link it with | 5 |
| Linked with its own title | 2 of 14 blogs |
| External links | 74 |
| Length | 9,050 |
0 this week (still settling) · peak 2
Show as table
| Week of | Value |
|---|---|
| 20 Jan 2025 | 1 |
| 27 Jan 2025 | 0 |
| 3 Feb 2025 | 1 |
| 10 Feb 2025 | 0 |
| 17 Feb 2025 | 0 |
| 24 Feb 2025 | 1 |
| 3 Mar 2025 | 0 |
| 10 Mar 2025 | 0 |
| 17 Mar 2025 | 0 |
| 24 Mar 2025 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 2025 | 0 |
| 7 Apr 2025 | 0 |
| 14 Apr 2025 | 0 |
| 21 Apr 2025 | 0 |
| 28 Apr 2025 | 0 |
| 5 May 2025 | 0 |
| 12 May 2025 | 1 |
| 19 May 2025 | 1 |
| 26 May 2025 | 0 |
| 2 Jun 2025 | 0 |
| 9 Jun 2025 | 1 |
| 16 Jun 2025 | 0 |
| 23 Jun 2025 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 2025 | 0 |
| 7 Jul 2025 | 0 |
| 14 Jul 2025 | 0 |
| 21 Jul 2025 | 0 |
| 28 Jul 2025 | 0 |
| 4 Aug 2025 | 0 |
| 11 Aug 2025 | 1 |
| 18 Aug 2025 | 1 |
| 25 Aug 2025 | 0 |
| 1 Sept 2025 | 0 |
| 8 Sept 2025 | 0 |
| 15 Sept 2025 | 0 |
| 22 Sept 2025 | 0 |
| 29 Sept 2025 | 0 |
| 6 Oct 2025 | 0 |
| 13 Oct 2025 | 2 |
| 20 Oct 2025 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2025 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2025 | 0 |
| 10 Nov 2025 | 0 |
| 17 Nov 2025 | 1 |
| 24 Nov 2025 | 0 |
| 1 Dec 2025 | 0 |
| 8 Dec 2025 | 0 |
| 15 Dec 2025 | 0 |
| 22 Dec 2025 | 0 |
| 29 Dec 2025 | 0 |
| 5 Jan 2026 | 0 |
| 12 Jan 2026 | 1 |
| 19 Jan 2026 | 1 |
| 26 Jan 2026 | 0 |
| 2 Feb 2026 | 0 |
| 9 Feb 2026 | 0 |
| 16 Feb 2026 | 0 |
| 23 Feb 2026 | 0 |
| 2 Mar 2026 | 0 |
| 9 Mar 2026 | 0 |
| 16 Mar 2026 | 0 |
| 23 Mar 2026 | 0 |
| 30 Mar 2026 | 0 |
| 6 Apr 2026 | 0 |
| 13 Apr 2026 | 0 |
| 20 Apr 2026 | 0 |
| 27 Apr 2026 | 0 |
| 4 May 2026 | 0 |
| 11 May 2026 | 1 |
| 18 May 2026 | 0 |
| 25 May 2026 | 0 |
| 1 Jun 2026 | 0 |
| 8 Jun 2026 | 0 |
| 15 Jun 2026 | 0 |
| 22 Jun 2026 | 0 |
| 29 Jun 2026 | 0 |
| 6 Jul 2026 | 0 |
| 13 Jul 2026 | 0 |
| 20 Jul 2026 | 0 |
| 27 Jul 2026 | 0 |
| 3 Aug 2026 | 0 |
| 10 Aug 2026 | 0 |
| 17 Aug 2026 | 0 |
| 24 Aug 2026 | 0 |
| 31 Aug 2026 | 0 |
| 7 Sept 2026 | 0 |
| 14 Sept 2026 | 0 |
| 21 Sept 2026 | 0 |
| 28 Sept 2026 | 0 (still settling) |
| 5 Oct 2026 | 0 (still settling) |
Shape: slow burn. Half of its 14 citing blogs had cited it after 204 days; 21% first cited it more than a year on.
Each blog counts once, in the week of its first citation. A blog added to the index recently can bring old first citations in at once.
Who cited it
Cited by 14 blogs across 4 subjects: technology 8, business and economics 2, books and writing 1, life 1, unclassified 2.
It crossed over: blogs in at least two subjects each make up 15% or more of its classified citers.
- Technology8
- Business and economics2
- Books and writing1
- Life1
- Unclassified2
Words blogs link it with
The words blogs link this page with, by how many different blogs use them.
- using chatgpt is not bad for the environment2 blogs
- "using chatgpt is not bad for the environment"1 blog
- 9,000-word article1 blog
- a much longer piece from masley1 blog
- ai and the environment1 blog
Cited by 14 blogs in 15 posts
One row per blog, the most recently citing first. Each shows the blog's newest citing post; open a row for the others.
linked as “AI and the environment”
Read at conspicuouscognition.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “consumes far more water”
Read at formerlytomato.codeberg.page (opens in a new tab)linked as “Individual AI Use Is Not A Massive Water Issue”
Read at webcurios.co.uk (opens in a new tab)linked as “pretty misleading”
Read at subdavis.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “more energy-efficient at delivering power specifically to computing chips than the electrical grid i…”
Read at holdfastprojects.com (opens in a new tab)1 other post
linked as “non-AI services”
Read at holdfastprojects.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “YouTube uses about 50 times as much energy as ChatGPT”
Read at patrickjuli.us (opens in a new tab)linked as “this wasn't an issue”
Read at decoherency.blogspot.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “Using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment”
Read at datawrapper.de (opens in a new tab)linked as “a much longer piece from Masley”
Read at scientistseessquirrel.wordpress.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “9,000-word article”
Read at tidbits.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “"Using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment"”
Read at macchaffee.com (opens in a new tab)linked as “Video streaming”
Read at manualdousuario.net (opens in a new tab)linked as “Using ChatGPT is not bad for the environment”
Read at kajsotala.fi (opens in a new tab)Links from this post
Elsewhere on andymasley.substack.com (21)
Something wrong here? Report a problem